A drafting table with a hand-drawn website map in cobalt ink, printed screenshots, and a magnifying glass.

Comparison

A document from the site. Not a digest of one page.

AI summarisation is built for the page in front of you. sitepaper is built for the site: it chooses the pages that carry the argument and writes a manuscript you can edit, cite, and export. Analyst adds claim-by-claim ratings with sources.

What you leave with

Four tools, four kinds of leftover

sitepaper

A manuscript

One ordered document — synthesis, white paper, or, on Analyst, a sourced critical analysis — ready to edit, cite, and export.

AI summarisation

A digest

A short recap of a page or a pasted excerpt. Useful for skimming. It is not a report on the site.

Chat research

A thread

Answers to the next question, with links that come and go. The work lives in the chat, not in a file you own.

Site scrapers

A pile of files

Every URL, or close to it, as markdown or HTML. You still have to read, discard, and write the document.

Feature by feature

Where the work actually happens

Summarisers compress. Chat research answers the next question. Scrapers collect files. sitepaper reads, chooses, and writes.

Feature comparison of sitepaper, AI summarisation, chat research, and site scrapers
FeaturesitepaperAI summarisationChat researchSite scrapers
Starts from a domain, not a pasteYesLimitedLimitedYes
Reads beyond the first pageYesNoLimitedYes
Chooses pages that add informationYesNoLimitedNo
Drops navigation, templates, and chromeYesLimitedLimitedLimited
Writes one continuous argumentYesNoLimitedNo
Synthesis, white paper, or Analyst critical analysisYesNoLimitedNo
Rates claims Fact, Fiction, or Contested (Analyst)YesNoLimitedNo
Editable manuscript you keepYesNoNoLimited
Export PDF, Word, and plain textYesLimitedLimitedLimited
Visible trail of the pages that were readYesNoLimitedYes
Crawl depth you set (Free 1, Standard up to 5, Analyst up to 10)YesNoNoLimited
Library of finished documents (Standard and Analyst)YesNoNoNo

“Limited” means the tool can approximate the job if you do the gathering, prompting, and assembly yourself.

Overhead of a research desk: a laptop showing a website beside an unbound cream manuscript, blue pencil, and printed pages.

The usual alternatives

What people try first

AI summarisation

A page in, a paragraph out

ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and browser “summarise this” tools compress what you can paste or open. They are fast at a single article. They do not walk a site, choose coverage, or leave you with a structured manuscript. Ask for a summary and you get a digest. Ask sitepaper for a domain and you get a document.

Chat research

Questions, not a handover

Perplexity and similar research chats are strong at answering the next question with citations. They are weaker at turning a whole website into one argument you can edit and send. The product is the conversation. sitepaper’s product is the file.

Site scrapers

Coverage without judgment

Crawlers and markdown dumpers collect pages. They do not decide which pages carry the argument, drop repeated chrome, or compose a white paper. You get raw material. sitepaper reads, chooses, and writes.

Questions

Before you paste a URL into a chatbot

How is sitepaper different from AI summarisation?
Summarisers compress a page or a paste into a short recap. sitepaper starts from a domain, reads the pages that matter, and writes a full document — a synthesis, a white paper, or, on Analyst, a critical analysis — that you can edit and export.
Can I just paste a site into ChatGPT?
You can paste what fits. You still choose the pages, lose the ones you never opened, and assemble the argument yourself. sitepaper does that research pass, then opens an editable manuscript.
Is this a scraper?
No. Scrapers collect URLs. sitepaper chooses coverage, drops templates and navigation, and writes one ordered document instead of a folder of files.
When should I use a summariser instead?
When you already have the page open and need a two-minute recap. Use sitepaper when the brief is the site itself — a vendor, a policy body, a competitor, a research programme — and you need a document to keep.
Which plan includes critical analysis?
Standard is $15 a month: synthesis up to 5 levels (200 pages), white papers up to 3 (200 pages), a library of finished documents, and generous monthly usage. Analyst is $35 a month: synthesis and white papers up to 10 levels and 600 pages, plus Critical Analysis — focused verification depth, up to 300 pages, with a source for every rating. If you use the included monthly writing up, Analyst can reset it for $30 for the rest of the month, Standard for $12, or wait until the 1st UTC.

Begin a report

If the brief is the site, start with the domain.

Create an account, name the site, and leave with a document instead of another summary.